GTAx 550

Great Detector!

Phil in Blanch, North Carolina -
I had a Garrett 500 that got wet and would not work anymore. However before it broke I found a 1945 walking liberty half dollar with it. Having success with it I purchased the model that replaced it, the GTAx550. Great machine also. Turn on and go. Great ground balance and very easy to set what you want to look for and what you don't.
The pinpoint function works great and so does the depth reading. I really like this machine. The battery compartment can unclip from the machine and clip onto your belt making a light machine even lighter. I can't wait for warmer weather to get out and hunt some more. Hope this helps take care!

Jan 10, 2012

1 Yes
0 No

Was this helpful to you? 

Garrett GTAx 550

Polly in Shropshire, England -
I bought one these and it was light and well-balanced. The depth was excellent: it gave the Minelab Sovereign a run for its money, and the Garrett had a smaller coil and a brisker sweep speed.

I found the depth gauge to be really useful for working out how large targets were as well as how deep. If, for example, you lifted the coil a foot off the ground and the depth on the gauge doubled you knew you had a very large (not coin-sized) object about a foot down.

The Garrett's Achilles heal is it's target ID/discrimination. To be fair, this has been the case with all the VDI style machines I've used. I ended up only digging signals that gave a clear bell-tone because anything less wasn't reliable.

I don't remember digging much iron though and it did pull deep coins. I think this is a slightly maligned machine, perhaps its weight gives it a toy-like quality but it really isn't.

Dec 26, 2011

2 Yes
0 No

Was this helpful to you? 

goods and bads with gtax550

Rick Nickolaus in Seattle, WA USA -
Bought a Garrett detector back in the mid 80's. Can't remember the model, but it costs $399.00. Loved it right out of the box. Unfortunately it was stolen, so my wife bought me a White's XLT. Good detector but decided to buy another Garrett in the same price range as the old one, the GTAx500. It is a good detector and well built as the old one. But I have some problems with it.

1. Detecting the same parks that I had no problems before with my White's, it gives off a lot of erratic crackles. Turning down the sensitivity helps some, but still annoying.

2. The discrimination is not very consistent. Will still sound off in areas that were supposedly canceled out.

3. The bell tone audio ID is more of an annoyance that a help. If you scan a good target, it will give the bell tone in both directions of the sweep, but on bad targets, many times it will give a bell tone in one direction, then not in the other. So I find myself continually rechecking targets because of the bell tone, not to mention having to check the ID screen, which defeats the purpose of the audio ID to begin with. My old White's had the same feature, which wasn't that much better, but at least I could program that feature out. That's not an option with this detector.

Garrett's good point:
1. Very solid and well built. Very light and well balanced. The removable battery compartment makes it even lighter.

2. The recovery rate of the Garrett is second to none. Which can be great in trashy areas.

3. Good depth strength. Gives solid signals even on deeper targets.

4. I love the simplicity of this detector. A simple key stroke on this machine can be multiple key strokes on my White's.

I still do have a lot of faith in Garrett products,(I absolutely love their Pro Pointer) and I am sure that this detector will be just a matter of learning its language. But that was something I didn't have to do with my old Garrett. To me it goes back to the old saying, "If you've got a great product, why try fixing it?" And, as far as I'm concerned, out of the box, that 25 year old detector was better than this one.

Mar 29, 2011

7 Yes
2 No

Was this helpful to you? 

better than not having a metal detector.

fanmegaman in Pismo beach, CA USA -
I am a rookie at detecting but mark my words it is worth in invsesting. I live along the coast and have found rings class rings you name it and has returned them back to their rightful owners. Its very good at pinpointing but if it marks it, it means its there. I am a proud owner and have no regrets ;) Hope this has helped

Apr 06, 2009

21 Yes
4 No

Was this helpful to you? 

Not too impressed

tabdog in Bryant, Arkansas -
I have a Bounty Hunter Quick draw II and I wanted to up grade so I got the Garrett 500.

The Garrett has higher quality materials and more bells and wistles but is very unstable around here. I don't know why because the QD II does just fine even with it's preset GB. The Garrett should do better with it's auto GB.

I can't get any depth out of the Garrett because of the instability.

I'm trying to sell my Garrett on Ebay and my slightly used Tesoro Cibola should arrive here tomorrow.

I hope it doesn't let me down like the Garrett did.

Sep 10, 2007

11 Yes
13 No

Was this helpful to you? 

Agreed, a good unit for the money

Rob Shinnick in Golden Isles of Georgia -
I have used the GTAx-550 for about two years and have found an 1850 large cent, and a six-inch-deep 1877-S dime in a park I've hunted for nearly 20 years, not to mention a small silver cache and a number of other coins and relics. It is a good middle-of- the-line detector. I used its predecessor, the old GTA-500, for about twelve years, and that machine paid for itself four or five times over, at a conservative estimate. I found coins dating back to the colonial era with that detector, and a rare War of 1812 US Light Dragoons beltplate that I sold for $1,000, despite its being bent, corroded, and ugly.

Here are some minor criticisms of the Garrett machines I have used:

1. Jumpy target ID (though I have learned to "read between the lines" and interpret some of those strange readings. To be fair, most if not all machines will perform erratically over certain targets, like large iron).

2. Less accurate discrimination than other brands I've tried (when set to reject something, the machine still beeps and ID's targets in that range sometimes). Is my sensitivity set too high? Maybe. But I still say the Bounty Hunter, Fisher, Tesoro, and Troy detectors I have used had much cleaner discrimination.

3. Fairly poor salt water beach performance, even when sensitivity is reduced. I could never get my old GTA-500 to work at all on the beach, despite the manufacturer's claims. I have gotten the GTAx-550 to work, but I felt its performance wasn't great. I've seen other folks with cheaper Garrett detectors do okay on the beach, though. I think my lack of success there is due partially my own lack of beachcombing expertise, but not entirely so.

4. The owners' manuals I have read were long on hype and short on useful information. They provided some useful info, but they also tooted their own horn too much and gushed about the product.

Those are my only real criticisms. Everything else is good.

I have noticed that nail and bottlecap rejection on the Garrets I have used (GTA-350, GTA-500, GTAx-550, GTI-2500) is pretty good, at least in my soil conditions, and better than some other brands I've used. I've used Fishers that seemed to love nails- I guess every machine must have that one trash item it really loves. The Garretts seem to like foil- it often reads in the nickel range.

Overall I have more experience with the GTA-500 and its modern counterpart, the GTAx-550, than with any other model or brand of detector. Sure, they have their quirks, but the fact that I've used them for more than a decade should tell you something- they're good machines.

Apr 24, 2006

58 Yes
2 No

Was this helpful to you? 

Verty good unit for the money

John Stark in Wichita, Ks -
Bought this unit a couple of months ago. It was very easy to get going with it..I reccommend following Garrett's advice in the video and use the turn on and go mode the first few hours to get used to how it reacts to different metals. I have had a lot of fun using it to find coins. It does a very good job of locating them and the pin point feature works well. The weight has not been a problem for me and I'm not a very big guy. It seems to be balanced pretty well. The only con I have found is that the pin point button is sometimes hard to keep depressed when you are in the pinpoint mode...All in all I have been very pleased with it so far.

Jul 10, 2005

18 Yes
2 No

Was this helpful to you? 

Great Starter Machine

John F in Texas -
This is a good machine to start with as it truely is a turn on and go detector. Depth & ID features are accurate, and the cointone feature is helpful. Not so good aspects are its weight, somewhat slow response, and the battery carriers are somewhat delicate.

Dec 11, 2004

45 Yes
8 No

Was this helpful to you?