Bounty Hunter Time Ranger
Price: $650Based on 21 reviews
Avg. Durability: 4.60
Avg. Ease of use: 4.00
Time ranger
Max Depth: 7 inches on US quarter
Overall Rating
Durability
Ease of Use
Would you recommend this to a new user?
Yes, absolutely!
Mark Szabo from
Cleveland, Ohio
92
Great bargain
Max Depth: 12 inches on US quarter
Overall Rating
Durability
Ease of Use
Would you recommend this to a new user?
Yes, absolutely!
Charley from
South Dakota
227
Great company
I own about 8 other detectors in different brands and I am impressed with this Time Ranger it is very light and when it is in coin mode it discriminates out iron completely I like the display, depth and target are fairly correct, I will have to spend more time learning the machine but so far I really like it.
Overall Rating
Durability
Ease of Use
Would you recommend this to a new user?
Yes, absolutely!
Rikk from
Pacific Northwest
1914
Bounty hunter time ranger
The whole idea of identifying targets digitally should be scrapped until they can design quicker circuitry to deal with the masking problem. Go back to relying on your hearing as they did in the past. I've ALWAYS found more that way. And all the depth in the world is NOTHING if the machine can't distinguish individual targets. When I bought my first screen i.D. Detector in 1990 (Garrett GTA 1000), I hated it so much, I traded up to another detector, the Fisher 1266X and found a LOT of good stuff.
I would have thought in all these years since then, they would have ironed out the problems but they haven't with the Bounty Hunter Time Ranger. I would NOT recommend this machine to any one along with some other brand and/or models as well. I have heard good things about White's detectors though (Eg, White's DFX, M6, Coinmaster Pro, SST, etc.)
Max Depth: 12 inches on US quarter
Overall Rating
Durability
Ease of Use
Would you recommend this to a new user?
No, not really.
Greg from
North Carolina
1732
Review for the bounty hunter time ranger
My Bounty Hunter Tracker IV is much quicker and more precise at a fraction of the price. The lag time is kind of like the lag on older-generation sports cars which used turbos. I'm really disappointed. Very deep but slow response.
Also, you have to back off the sensitivity to eliminate the false signals to ground minerals. Kind of defeats the purpose of a deep-seeking detector. Now if only the Tracker IV could go 12" on a single quarter. Would be nice. Oh well, I'm dreaming.
Max Depth: 12 inches on US quarter
Overall Rating
Durability
Ease of Use
Would you recommend this to a new user?
No, not really.
Greg from
North Carolina
1219
7 years on
Overall Rating
Darren from
Perth Australia
216
YES! IT'S WATERPROOF?
Overall Rating
HJ from
Ft. lauderdale, FL
129
Awsome, Awesome, and more Asome.
Overall Rating
Hunter from
Pompano beach, FL
155
A very versatile metal detector !
I hunt mainly for modern coinage/jewelry on beaches, and, considering some humble experience with various brands/models over the years, I was luckily able to use the very full capacities of this unit after only a few hours of use.
So far, it seems that when the unit starts up at "average" settings, it is, using the same search coils, more powerful than my two other BH models. It also IDs much better, the three digit number is clearly an advantage here.
There are, to me, no drawbacks to this detector. I always buy detectors that suit my needs, be they as humble as a Tesoro Compadre or BH Lone star, this one not only does the job very well, (6/8 cm on a 18K thin gold chain in prospecting mode with the 4" coil and a good ability to signal coins and other valuables with a correct ID process), but its versatility, that is the possibility of engaging different treasure hunting tasks with this same unit, deserves the 5 stars I rated it, and makes it, just as many finds it already did, a "keeper".
My "general experience" with 3 BH units is that they will find treasure as well, and sometimes better than any other detector.
HH
Overall Rating
Paperone from
Europe
405
Diferent
The owner of this machine do not need fitness club membership only a good shovel.
Overall Rating
Sam from
Canada
2726